A major problem with the infrastructure bill, aside from its cost, is its lack of focus. The Democrats have tried to include everything but the kitchen sink. The Republicans have tried to exclude non-traditional items from infrastructure bill, such as childcare. Nevertheless, the bill contains a hodge-podge of projects from roads and bridges to broadband internet connection. The main goal seems to be pushing a lot of money out the door, rather than funding specific projects. This will lead to a lot of waste, fraud, and mismanagement. Since there are no priorities, politicians will fund pet projects and projects pushed by favored constituents, rather than projects that are
Much of Biden’s and the Democrats’ agenda seems to be giving blacks reparations payments without calling them that. The previous stimulus bills and the proposed infrastructure bill will undertake a massive transfer of assets from white people to black and brown people, both in terms of jobs that will employ mainly black and brown people and in terms of the beneficiaries of the projects, e.g., the main beneficiaries of improved broadband internet will be poorer black and brown people. Better internet is a priority, but we should recognize that there is a second agenda here. Similarly, the Democrats will try to get more roads and bridges built in poorer parts of town. That’s not bad, but it may not be what America needs to best improve its transportation system. Of course, the non-traditional infrastructure proposals err even more in the direction of wasted money. There will be some short-term benefit to spending money on warm and fuzzy things like childcare, but it will not provide the same benefit to the nation as repairing roads and bridges.
I would prefer to see narrowly focused bills, e.g., a bill to replace bridges that have fallen into a certain state of disrepair that makes this dangerous to use. A bill to repair airports that have become unsafe. A bill specifically targeting broadband internet. These bills could provide specific benchmarks to decide whether the programs were succeeding or not. Otherwise, there will be lots of handwaving and celebrating all the money that got spent without evaluating whether we got our money’s worth.
Finally, I am not sure that this is the time to do infrastructure for infrastructure’s sake, even if it is well planned. We have just spent trillions on the previous stimulus bills, and we will continue to spend trillions on the theory that debt and deficits no longer matter. It’s possible that there has been some change in the world financial situation that makes the national debt meaningless. But it’s also possible that this is a temporary situation and someday interest rates may go back up and future generations will be faced with insurmountable debt, with will limit their future and leave them cursing this “me” generation that spent all its money on itself.
In the last few days, it looks like China has begun to take a more conservative approach to its financial wellbeing, limiting financial IPOs and huge expansions of businesses. This may be political, protecting the power of the Chinese central government, but it could also be financially based, to make sure that the economy does not spin out of control. Meanwhile, the US seems totally unconcerned about the red-hot financial situation as it pumps tons of money out the door and looks the other way as more and more “unicorns” go public, fed by trillions of investors’ dollars. Maybe there is no tomorrow, but what if it rains tomorrow? Will China be in better shape to deal with the rain? I am afraid it might be. There seems to be a consensus that there are not storm clouds on the horizon, but what if we are not looking closely enough. Maybe those few clouds are not as harmless as they look.